One of the things that we have evaluated by that question is "why does the bride change her name?" Is this a cultural expectation that just goes back in history and we've forgotten its purpose? Is it a display of our misogynistic society? Is it an androcentric idea?
I was reminded of this when watching TV one afternoon and a couple was arguing about whether or not the bride should change her name. This commercial has prompted this post, because I think it is something we have forgotten as a culture. Changing a name is not a demarkation of property, it is a sign of a covenant. For those of us who still believe marriage is a God given covenant, this is very important.
In order to understand the significance of any covenant we have to understand what a covenant is, and what it is not. First, what it is:
- Bond or agreement between two people
- One person is primarily responsible for said covenant
- It is usually sealed in blood
- If one party breaks the covenantal agreement, the other party doesn't break it, but rather tries to restore the covenant.
This is different from a contract. A covenant is not a contract, but our world is very comfortable with contracts, heck, I'm a contract worker for a lot of different jobs. Here are some properties of a contractual relationship.
- Agreement between two parties
- Both parties are equally responsible
- Sealed by a signature or handshake
- If one breaks the contract the other party is no longer obligated to fulfill their end.
The differences are subtle but a covenant is not a contract. Let's look at some examples of covenants.
Abraham and circumcision: God establishes Abraham as the father of his people and seals that covenant by male circumcision. Needless to say, God is primarily responsible for this agreement as he is going to protect them, lead them, and provide for them. The circumcision is only a mark of this agreement. If Abraham breaks the agreement how does God handle it? He doesn't just wipe his hands and walk away... he seeks earnestly to restore the covenant. And then, there's the blood, when flesh is cut, it produces blood.
Jesus and the crucifixion: When Christ died on the cross, he sealed the new covenant that God has made with believers. There was no shortage of blood, and God is definitely the one primarily responsible for this relationship.
Marriage: In the Christian understanding, though the husband and wife are seen as equals, the husband is the one who is held responsible. In the first marriage, when Adam and Eve sin, God does not call for Eve, even though she sinned first. He is looking for Adam; why did he allow this to happen? He was responsible for Eve's mistake as well as his own. In Ephesians 5 this is outlined by Paul even more, the husband is the head of the wife, not as domineering tyrant, but loving provider. (Shayla likes to remind me of the quote from My Big Fat Greek Wedding where the wife says "the husband may be the head, but the wife is the neck, she can turn the head any direction she wants.") This does not mean he is a better person, nor any closer to Jesus, but he is the one responsible for the relationship. Where is the blood? There was an 18th and 19th century practice of hanging the bloodied honeymoon sheets outside the bedroom to show that the covenant had been sealed and the marriage consummated... I'll leave it at that.
But there's one more thing, what's in a name? Names show who you are, it's your identity, it's how people call you, identify you, and recognize you. When God makes his covenant with Abram and Sarai he changes their names to Abraham and Sarah. While God is changing Abram's name from "exalted father" to "father of a multitude" he's also subtly marking his name in Abram's by placing an "h" or "-ah" in it. God places his name, or the shortened version of it, on Abram and Sarai to make their names AbrAHam and SarAH. He is showing that he's responsible for them. The one responsible for the covenant gives their name.
This is one reason why Shayla and I will continue this tradition, in recognition of our covenantal bond to God and each other through our marriage.
1 comment:
So lovely, Justin, and yes, so true, and yes, biblical name changes always mark a change in identity, a new mission.
When I got married, I was an atheist and felt no connection to a covenant with God. I *did* see marriage as something resembling a contract. After my conversion, I didn't immediately change my name, but as we were starting our family (which was also a huge conversion -- we'd gotten married with the agreement that we wouldn't have kids), I began to think more deeply about the issue. I worked in a school at that time, and I saw many broken families and children who bounced back and forth between parents, etc. I was still learning my faith, and still learning about covenant at that time, but God had put the idea on my heart -- I remember feeling that I wanted the world to know that we were a family, that we were one unit, one flesh, that we were in this together, and I finally took my husband's name.
So happy for you and Shayla!!
Post a Comment